Gaspar Noe Love Torrent

About Usis a subreddit for in-depth discussions about film.We want to encourage and support in-depth, intellectual discussion. Clear, polite and well-written responses should be upvoted; opinions should not be downvoted. RulesGeneral:.All discussion must be related to film.No racism, sexism, or other forms of bigotry.Moderators have final discretion.Posts:.Threads must promote in-depth discussion.Threads must point discussion in a specific direction.Links to outside articles must be submitted in a self-post and are subject to the above posting rules.Comments:.Be civil and don’t downvote opinions.There is a 180 character minimum for top-level comments.Follow us on:.TrueFilm Resources:.TrueFilm Projects. Disclaimer: This post is not trying to encourage people to download films illegally. It only seeks to gather opinions and create a constructive discussion on the advantages this practice might offer and the obvious consequences of doing it. To all commenters: Please do not post links of torrent files and other media obtained illegally.​My opinion is pretty straightforward.

I don't want to talk politics and accuse production companies of being greedy capitalist organizations seeking profit by exploiting the weak minds of the masses. I'd really like to know what this community thinks about P2P sharing, how much it can help third world countries and remote areas of the world access art and other media that can't be found anywhere close to them.​I think it's an incredible technology that seeks to maximize the selective and targeted distribution of films by the distributors and producers of the industry. I live in a small country in Southern Europe and the amount of art that reaches us is minimal. We only have a handful of cinema chains and they only screen the latest blockbusters; action flicks and American comedies. The genres we all probably despise or ignore. Videoteques are almost extinct and they just sell or rent the same blockbusters found in cinemas.

Amazon Video, Hulu and HBO are not available here at all; meanwhile, Netflix only has 200 films (mostly Indian, Turkish and American b-movies) and 33 TV Series (almost all Netflix originals). I could buy DVDs and BluRays on ebay for $10 - $15, excluding shipping and customs fees (which are incredibly high in my country). The average monthly wage here is $250.​I suppose most countries also have the same limits about the films they can access. Choices are scarce for people that live outside North America and the EU. This technology allows billions of people to download a multitude of wonderful art for free.

I can't even find any way to watch it - torrent, paid, streaming, anything. Only one I didn't like of his was Love but this looks exciting, him and benoit debie.

I'd have never been able to enjoy the works of David Fincher, Tarantino, Kubrick, Coppola, Scorsese, Hitchcock, Inarritu, Cuaron, Pasolini, Fellini, Sorrentino, Godard, Tarkovsky, Gaspar Noe, Windin Refn, Wong Kar Wai and so on.​I'm not trying to justify myself, I'd just like to read honest opinions by this community. What do you think about torrents and other forms of P2P file sharing?

Is it right to brake the law and 'steal' films and other media when you can't access it in any other way? Do you think this has an impact on the profit of the production companies, and especially what the cast and crew earns?. I live in a country that, due to some complicated geo-political issues, has almost no accessible movie theaters. Our borders are completely controlled by a foreign country's military, and they severely limit our ability to import goods.There is also rampant unemployment, underemployment, low wages, and high cost of living.You can legally and affordably access things like the newest Avengers film if you so like, although anything with sex/nudity will be difficult to come by for reasons other than those mentioned above.I also teach film studies at a university here.My job would be impossible without Piracy or P2P file sharing. Back when I lived in Los Angeles I encouraged legal access to films because they were playing at a theater near us all the time (especially art films. The simple fact is, no amount of piracy is going to hurt tentpoles.

But independent, and art films really need financial support.) But I think the democratization and proliferation of cinema is a good thing, and shouldn't be something only available to countries and people with above average standards of living. I don't think we can really compare the experiences of the 20th century greats with that of young artists today. The entire nature of cinema's place in society is different.Many of the 20th century greats had greater access to good movies in their original format than young people do today, even with the internet.I am thinking specifically about the French filmmakers - Godard and Truffaut have both talked about seeing three or four films a day multiple days a week. In a world where the television was still rare and an all-day cinema ticket cost less than a cup of coffee, they were able to see all the old masters and a lot of contemporary films.Even in film cities like Paris and New York you can't really do that anymore, and haven't been able to since the 70's. Paradoxically, the filmmakers of the 20th century had easier access to film than a lot of young artists today, especially those who don't live in a big city.Unfortunately, I think piracy is often the only option for a lot of people, especially when you get into film and video art.For example: should I really fork over $120 for Because that's currently the only way to watch It Wasn't Love legally.This example is really not all that out there for a lot of hard to find film and video art. Piracy did not kill the old school movie going experience at all.

An increase in other available forms of entertainment did. Attendance began dropping all around the world in the 70's and 80's, and it wasn't because people were pirating 'Return of the Jedi.' People had TVs at home. Cable started to become a thing, as did video games and video arcades. Concert attendance went up.

People became more focused on fitness. The big studios dwindled in power and influence. A whole lot happened to kill the type of movie going that the great directors engaged in.

If piracy was a factor, it was a small one, along with a host of others. For most cases I use p2p and piracy interchangeably since there is generally no argument that p2p is a fantastic technology.

For Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition on the PlayStation 4, GameFAQs has 62 cheat codes and secrets. Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition Cheats and Cheat Codes, PlayStation 4. Sleeping Dogs™ Definitive Edition Cheats for Playstation 4. This section collects a base of Sleeping Dogs™ Definitive Edition cheats and console commands, hacks and other secrets for Playstation 4 that we managed to get. Unfortunately, the cheat codes for this game aren't ready yet. Sleeping dogs definitive edition ps4 cheats. The best place to get cheats, codes, cheat codes, walkthrough, guide, FAQ, unlockables, trophies, and secrets for Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition for PlayStation 4 (PS4). For Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition on the PlayStation 4, GameFAQs has 5 FAQs (game guides and walkthroughs), 62 cheat codes and secrets, 1 review, 17 critic reviews, and 16 user screenshots.

It is objectively a positive for consumers, filmmakers, scholars and activists. Afanche3d pro for mac pc. The film industry has funded several studies in hopes of having proof of that piracy hurts their bottom line, only to end up burying the study because it proves the opposite. Eliminating piracy was projected to have a negative impact profits across industries (film, games, books).I see piracy as a gap filler for a demand that is unmet or comes with burdens consumers will not meet.

Publisher doesn't see a profit in releasing an unpopular film, piracy will step in. Government doesn't like the message of a film, piracy will step in. Publishers require burdensome DRM, piracy will step in.The fracturing of streaming services, with each distributor requiring a separate subscription will probably kick off a surge in p2p streaming as the burden becomes objectionable.

I know I only rated it a seven out of ten but that's because I admit this film's faults. It certainly isn't near perfect but I felt very moved by the characters and their story. Lots of people may not be able to relate to this film however those of us that do can say that everything about this depiction of love has been experienced and is real. As a grown single adult living in today's dating world I can attest that the relationship between Murphy and Electra exists. Their obsession with each other and with sex that led them into a deep and possibly unreal infatuation was honest and thought provoking. Love sometimes doesn't make sense and can't be described or made logical. Their connection was what drove them into darkness, madness and despair. Love is completely all consuming on any level it's represented on. So many times have I given myself up for something that a year later I looked back on and couldn't reconcile my behavior, and so many times have I given myself up to something to only sabotage it before it completely devoured me. I don't know if I have been in love, but I have felt what these characters are going through and I wouldn't know what else to call it. In the vein of Harmony Korine and Lars von Trier I think Gasper Noe is a genius. Yes this movie is uncomfortable, yes the acting isn't great and yes the story is dry, but it's a genuine take on what relationships look like for some people in their mid twenties to early thirties and I loved every second of it.